Why More AI Companies Are Choosing Task-Based W‑2 Employees

Why is task-based W2 employment becoming so popular? 

The AI boom is in full swing. With it comes a surge in demand for skilled human input.  AI companies depend on a massive volume of specialized labor, especially when it comes to language training, data annotation, content moderation, and reinforcement learning.

Historically, these tasks were outsourced to independent contractors. But a new trend is taking over: task-based W‑2 employment.

If that term makes you pause—good. It’s reshaping how the smartest AI companies build their contingent workforces.

Let’s break it down.

From Gig to Employee: The Shift from 1099 to W2

Until recently, using 1099 contractors was the default way to staff AI projects. It seemed easier. Faster. More flexible. You posted the job, found a freelancer, and handed off the work.

But as AI projects become more advanced, so do the demands placed on human contributors. You’re no longer asking someone to click through a batch of image tags. You’re asking them to help train multimodal models in multiple languages, review legal documents for algorithmic fairness, or assess AI-generated video dialogue for cultural nuance.

In other words: this isn’t gig work anymore, so it can’t be treated as such. 

That’s where task-based W‑2 employment comes in. It gives companies the flexibility of short-term staffing without the legal risks, quality issues, or headaches that often come with managing a sprawling fleet of freelancers.

What Exactly Is Task-Based W‑2 Employment?

In simple terms, it’s when a company hires workers as W‑2 employees. This can even happen in circumstances where workers are only needed for a specific project or task.

Unlike independent contractors (who receive a 1099 form and are legally self-employed), W‑2 employees are actual employees. Their taxes are withheld. They can be trained, supervised, and onboarded with full documentation. They may work part-time, flexibly, or on a short-term basis—but they’re not legally on their own.

And that distinction matters a lot, especially in states like California, New York, and Massachusetts, where misclassification audits are increasingly common.

Why the Old 1099 Model Is Breaking Down

Here are just a few ways 1099 contractor arrangements fall short in the modern AI landscape:

  • Limited Training Allowed – Legally, you can’t train a 1099 contractor beyond general project guidance. That’s a problem when your AI tasks require deep domain knowledge or evolving guidelines.

  • No Schedule Control – You can’t require a freelancer to be online during specific hours, which makes real-time collaboration nearly impossible.

  • Data Security Gaps – Independent contractors often use their own laptops, work from unsecured environments, and juggle projects from competing companies. That’s a nightmare for anyone handling sensitive datasets.

  • High Turnover – Freelancers often treat each project as disposable. If a better gig comes along, they’re gone.

In contrast, task-based W‑2 employees can be trained, monitored, assigned shift schedules, and equipped with secure tools—all without violating labor law.

How W‑2 Improves AI Project Outcomes

The benefits of switching to task-based W‑2 aren’t just legal. They’re operational.

With W‑2 team members, companies gain:

  • Greater control over performance and quality

  • Stronger worker loyalty and morale

  • Better institutional knowledge over time

  • Compliance with federal and state employment laws

  • Fewer risks tied to audits, fines, or lawsuits
  • Happier contract employees


At HireArt, we’ve helped companies build task-based W‑2 workforces for everything from NLP tuning to RLHF feedback.

  • Zoox, the autonomous vehicle company, increased retention to 90% after moving 88 contractors into a single employer-of-record model with HireArt.


That kind of consistency doesn’t happen with scattered gig work.

Where This Trend Is Headed

AI companies that rely on human input require speed, skill, and structure. The days of relying on gig workers to provide a quick fix are over.

With new models being fine-tuned weekly and use cases evolving daily, companies need contributors who are invested, trainable, and secure.

That’s not a gig workerr, that’s a W‑2 employee, even if only for a six-week NLP sprint or a three-month video tagging project.

As the lines between “full-time” and “freelance” blur, we believe task-based W‑2 employment offers the best of both worlds while keeping operations compliant.

TL;DR: Why W2 Just Works Better for AI

  • More Control: Set schedules, assign shifts, enforce feedback loops.

  • More Compliance: Meet labor laws without fear of misclassification.

  • More Quality: Trained workers = better, more consistent output.

  • More Security: Work happens in secure environments with vetted tools.

  • More Loyalty: Workers feel part of a team, not a temp stop.

And the good news? You don’t need to build this from scratch. HireArt makes W‑2 workforce management seamless—with tools, policies, and compliance infrastructure already in place.

Curious How This Looks in Practice?

We’re seeing this shift play out across some of the most innovative AI firms in the country—and it’s working.

Ready to explore whether task-based W‑2 employment is the right fit for your next project?

👉 Download the full eBook here to see how companies are building better, faster, and safer AI workforces.

No items found.